翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ "O" Is for Outlaw
・ "O"-Jung.Ban.Hap.
・ "Ode-to-Napoleon" hexachord
・ "Oh Yeah!" Live
・ "Our Contemporary" regional art exhibition (Leningrad, 1975)
・ "P" Is for Peril
・ "Pimpernel" Smith
・ "Polish death camp" controversy
・ "Pro knigi" ("About books")
・ "Prosopa" Greek Television Awards
・ "Pussy Cats" Starring the Walkmen
・ "Q" Is for Quarry
・ "R" Is for Ricochet
・ "R" The King (2016 film)
・ "Rags" Ragland
・ ! (album)
・ ! (disambiguation)
・ !!
・ !!!
・ !!! (album)
・ !!Destroy-Oh-Boy!!
・ !Action Pact!
・ !Arriba! La Pachanga
・ !Hero
・ !Hero (album)
・ !Kung language
・ !Oka Tokat
・ !PAUS3
・ !T.O.O.H.!
・ !Women Art Revolution


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

sua sponte : ウィキペディア英語版
sua sponte

In law, ''sua sponte'' (Latin: "of his, her, its or their own accord") or ''suo motu'' "on its own motion"〔(【引用サイトリンク】) eKLR">url=http://kenyalaw.org/caselaw/cases/view/103475/ )〕 describes an act of authority taken without formal prompting from another party. The term is usually applied to actions by a judge taken without a prior motion or request from the parties. The form ''nostra sponte'' ("of our own accord") is sometimes used by the court itself, when the action is taken by a multi-member court, such as an appellate court, rather than by a single judge (third parties describing such actions would still refer to them as being taken by the court as a whole and therefore as 'sua sponte'). While usually applied to actions of a court, the term may reasonably be applied to actions by government agencies and individuals acting in official capacity.
One situation in which a party might encourage a judge to move ''sua sponte'' occurs when that party is preserving a special appearance (usually to challenge jurisdiction), and therefore cannot make motions on its own behalf without making a general appearance. Common reasons for an action taken ''sua sponte'' are when the judge determines that the court does not have subject-matter jurisdiction or that the case should be moved to another judge because of a conflict of interest, even if all parties disagree.
== Notable cases ==

* ''Carlisle v. United States'' 517 U.S. 416 (1996) – The Supreme Court of the United States ruled that a district court could not move ''sua sponte'' to grant a judgment of acquittal (notwithstanding the verdict) to remedy the late filing of the equivalent motion.
* ''Trest v. Cain'' 522 U.S. 87 (1997), 94 F.3d 1005 – The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit moved ''sua sponte'' to reject a ''habeas corpus'' claim because of procedural default, citing an obligation to do so. The Supreme Court ruled that this was not obligatory, but declined to rule whether it was permitted.
* Since 2009, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has frequently taken up ''suo motu'' cases against government authorities there. This includes cases involving violence in the country, government corruption, imposing price ceilings on various commodities, and many other cases.〔(Karachi violence suo motu: Supreme Court to resume proceedings from today – The Express Tribune )〕〔(SC reserves verdict in POL GST suo motu case | Pakistan Today | Latest news | Breaking news | Pakistan News | World news | Business | Sport and Multimedia )〕〔(Pakistan court takes suo motu notice of Hazara killings - The Hindu )〕〔(Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan )〕〔(Pak`s CJ takes suo motu notice of illegal CNG licences )〕 The extent to which the court should exercise this authority is a matter of political debate.〔(The power of suo motu – The Express Tribune )〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「sua sponte」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.